The View From the Soul
She was cute and perky
and couldn’t have been blonder, with see-through eyebrows, and a
distance-runner’s body that did it for me; she was the friend of some friends
of mine and the co-presenter of a late-morning hello-housewives TV show:
“Well, Peggy, who is
our guest for today?”
“Well, Mario,” talking
through a toothy smile, eyes on camera and not Mario, “Blah-blah, the
sister-in-law of Spurs’ assistant trainer Blah-Blah, is coming by to show us
some of her amazing macrame creations!”
… that kind of thing
My friends and she and
I were lazing on the concrete apron by the Trinity University
swimming pool, and somehow the conversation came around to wills, and I
mentioned that I’d bequeathed my cadaver to the U of Texas medical school for
instructional purposes.
This freaked Peggy out.
She shuddered and grimaced at the idea of students cutting her body’s innards
apart in minute detail. “Have you ever seen what that looks like? It’s so – so
humiliating!”
It didn’t occur to me
to mention that my GP daddy had a photo of himself, along with a couple of
med-school pals, hamming it up over a cadaver they’d been dissecting. Probably
a good thing.
All I said was that
once I’m dead I won’t give a fuck about that.
Oh well, I wasn’t even
considering the possibility of getting anywhere with Peggy on a personal level,
anyhow – I’m not a distance runner. I did, however, line her up to interview for a newspaper column I was
writing at the time.
Thirty-six or
thirty-seven years later, what I should’ve said then came to me. None of that
facepalm-a-few-hours-later business; it took a while.
What came to me has to
do with, as cliché would have it, the mystery of death. Sure, what I told
Peggy, that dead is gone, that being dead is like blacking out from too much
whisky, only not waking up the next morning wondering how I got there and what
bones and furniture I’ve broken – that it’s the same nothing as before I was
born – is most likely the case.
Other speculative
hypotheses remain as yet undisproven, though. We may indeed be in some way what
could be called, for want of better words, spiritual beings. If the scientific
method ever demonstrates that all of these speculations are impossible, then
blackout it is – no argument.
Since we don’t as yet
have the technology to do this, I’ll speculate that, although unlikely, our
self-or-spirit-or-soul-or-whatever does exist in some form. For various reasons,
though, I consider that all the concepts of the soul of all the well-known
religions are too unlikely for me to take them seriously, primarily because
they’re all culture-specific, but I’m not going to get into that here.
The basis for my
speculation here comes from the physicist Richard Feynman, who noted that since
the half-life of the phosphorous in the brains of mammals is about two weeks, all
of the atoms in our brains have been there for less than a month. This,
however, does not change our memories or values or personality quirks, all of
which continue seamlessly as the atoms come and go – barring some trauma.
Feynman called this
continuing self a dance in which the molecules that become our brains take part
before moving on, always replaced by new atoms, ‘but always performing the same
dance, remembering what that dance was’ when they’d arrived.
So, what is the nature
of this dance, and does it survive the demise of the flow of oxygen molecules
to the atoms dancing it?
Okay, Peggy, let’s just
speculate that the dance is composed of unimaginably complex sets of waves
somewhere on the electromagnetic – or some other – spectrum for which we have
as yet no instruments that can detect them: sort of like TV broadcasts with no
TV receivers, only much more complex.
Now, what these wavy
spirits do and where they go after the body dies is of course wide-open to all
sorts of imaginative speculation.
Heaven and Hell?
Childishly, ridiculously unlikely, culturally specific, and anyway, even if less than total bullshit
not within viewing range of any med school laboratory table,
so no problem for Peggy.
Migrating intact into a
foetus in the womb of a pubescent rape victim in rural Uttar Pradesh or a
capybara in the eastern Peruvian Amazon or some other sentient mama? Well,
maybe, but the likelihood of this suffers from too many how-abouts, and anyway,
it doesn’t involve being on a ceiling at some University School of Medicine
looking down.
What I think is more
likely, whilst less likely than oblivion, might be that people’s individual
spirit units merge with a more or less all-encompassing world-soul that, in
part, encompasses the spirits of all deceased sentient beings. This, by the
way, would be a good basis for ethical behaviour, as you would then at death
experience all the pleasure, pain, joy, terror, and, well, experience of every
other sentient being, so what you do to others really would come back to you to
experience – but not the experience of your cadaver being sliced up, as you
would have already left it.
This leaves us – unless
you have some further speculations, which I’d love to hear – to consider
ghosts, or individual wave complexes hanging out in the world. It seems to me
that ghosts that haunt houses or other places where they’d been when alive
would be the spirits of really boring people, when – once freed from the body –
they’d have a whole world, maybe a whole universe, to explore, but instead just
stay put, and those souls who stick around to torment those who’d done them
wrong would be vindictive sorts with whom I’d want nothing to do, especially
when everything is available to me.
Also, since our spirits
would no longer be plugged into our sensory-input organs, would they be able to
perceive things in the physical world or only in that of complex wave systems
of a certain wavelength? Shit, how the fuck would I know? Maybe something to
consider.
Anyway, Peggy, all this
has taken us to the crux of your problem. Even though it seems to me to be much
less likely than nothingness or merging with the world-soul, I concede the
possibility that we may become free spirits, emancipated by release from our
bodies, and that, even more unlikely, we somehow maintain the ability to
perceive physical phenomena. I know that you’re neither a boring nor vindictive
person, but if the idea of the indignities and aesthetic yuckiness of
dissection distresses you, why watch?
I know that, despite
all those ifs and increasing degrees of unlikeliness, should I have the chance
to observe my cadaver’s dissection I certainly would. I think it’d be
fascinating. And besides, I’d love to see the med students' reactions when they get to my dick.

No comments:
Post a Comment